The Owner's Guide to AI
How to Use AI for Business: A Practical Guide for Owners
How to use AI for business, in one paragraph: pick one painful, recurring writing or reading task, hand it to Claude or ChatGPT with real context, and repeat until it saves you an hour a week—then add the next task. This guide shows which work pays back first, how to start in five steps, and what to ignore for now.
1-on-1 with Pete Enestrom, on your actual work

Written by Pete Enestrom
Yale & Columbia, ex-Microsoft & Intel — 1-on-1 AI coaching for executives

Your coach’s background
Most owners I meet have the same quietly uncomfortable relationship with AI. They have tried a tool once or twice, watched it write something passable, and gone back to work. Meanwhile the headlines insist their competitors are rebuilding entire companies around the technology. Neither experience is quite true, and the gap between them is where most of the confusion lives.
Here is what I tell every founder and executive I coach: using AI in your business is not a transformation program, a software purchase, or an IT project. It is a personal habit that starts with one annoying task on your own desk and spreads from there. The companies getting real value from AI did not start with a strategy deck. They started with a leader who got good at one thing, then two, then taught the person next to them.
I wrote this guide for the owner of a $20–500M company who wants the practical version: where AI genuinely pays back, how to start this week without spending a dollar on new systems, and how to know whether any of it is working. It is the same sequence I use with coaching clients in our first month together.
Where does AI actually pay back in a real company?
Forget the demos for a moment: in a non-technical company, AI pays back where the hours already go, and in most $20–500M companies the hours go to writing, reading, and deciding. The work that pays back first shares three traits. The task involves language—drafting, summarizing, comparing, explaining. The task recurs weekly or daily, so a small saving compounds. And the task already lives with a person who can judge the output, so nothing needs to be installed, integrated, or approved by IT. When owners ask me how AI can help their business, I point them at that overlap before anything else: language-heavy, recurring, judged by a human.
In practice, four categories cover most of the early wins. Drafting: customer emails, proposals, job postings, board pre-reads, the first version of anything. Summarizing: long reports, meeting notes, contracts you need the shape of, the 60-page document you have been avoiding. Research and comparison: what a competitor just announced, three vendor quotes side by side, the questions you should ask before a decision. Documentation: the processes that live in one person's head, turned into written procedures a new hire could follow. Every one of those is a chat-window task—no engineer, no integration, no new system.
Notice what is not on that list: forecasting, automation pipelines, anything that touches your ERP or your customer database. Those are real opportunities, but they belong to a later phase and usually to outside builders. The owner's starting game is simpler and, frankly, more valuable at first: get the hours back, then decide what the hours are for.
The 80/20: four workhorse workflows
If you only ever get good at four uses of AI, make it these four. They cover most of what a leadership team at a mid-market company actually does all week.
Drafting
- First versions of customer emails, proposals, job postings, and announcements.
- You bring the facts and the tone; the tool produces the structure in seconds.
- The edit pass is where your judgment goes—ten minutes instead of a blank page.
Summarizing
- Board packs, industry reports, long email threads, meeting notes.
- Paste the document, ask for the shape: what changed, what matters, what is undecided.
- Reading time drops from an hour to minutes; you still check the parts that matter.
Research & comparison
- Competitor announcements, vendor options, questions to ask before a decision.
- Works on material you paste in—not a replacement for verified, current facts.
- Best output: the five questions to put to your team on Monday morning.
Documentation
- Processes that live in someone's head, turned into written procedures.
- Describe the process messily; the tool asks what you skipped, then writes it up.
- Every documented process makes the next hire easier and the business less fragile.
How do you get started? Five steps, one painful task
This is the exact sequence I walk owners through in week one. It works with Claude or ChatGPT, on a free plan, starting from a standing stop. The only requirement is one real task that genuinely annoys you.
Pick ONE painful, recurring task
Not the most important task in the company—the one you personally dread and repeat. The weekly summary you owe your leadership team. The customer email you have been putting off. The report you read every month that takes an hour. Painful and recurring beats important and rare, because repetition is what turns a trick into a habit.
Do that task with AI this week
Open Claude or ChatGPT and hand it the same materials you would hand a sharp new hire: the source document or thread, who the output is for, and what a good result looks like. Then ask for the draft or the summary. Budget thirty minutes for the first attempt, including the back-and-forth. It will feel slower than doing it yourself. That is normal, and it is the last time it will be.
Refine until the output is genuinely usable
The first answer is a first draft. Push back in plain language: shorter, less formal, the second point is wrong and here is why. Two or three rounds of correction is where the quality appears, and the corrections you make are exactly the instructions you will build into the prompt next time. Stop when you would actually send or use the result with light editing.
Save the prompt that worked
When a run produces something good, copy the full prompt—context, instructions, everything—into a note. That saved prompt is now a reusable asset: your monthly-report prompt, your customer-reply prompt, your board-prep prompt. Within a month you have a small personal playbook, and each run of each prompt gets faster and better.
Add the next two workflows, then stop adding
After two or three weeks of the first task running smoothly, add two more from the workhorse list above—usually one summarizing task and one drafting task. Three reliable workflows is the right size for month one. Three is enough to change how your week feels, and few enough that each one gets the repetition it needs to stick.
What does a good first prompt look like?
Three of the first workflows I recommend most often, as copy-paste prompts. Replace the brackets with your material. Notice how much of each prompt is context—who you are, who it is for, what good looks like. That context is the whole craft.
I run a [one line about your company] and every week I owe my leadership team a summary. Here are my raw notes from this week: [paste your notes]. Write the summary in my voice: the three things that mattered most, one thing that is stuck and why, and what I need from the team next week. Under 300 words, plain language, no corporate speak.
The first week, expect to correct the voice two or three times. Save the final version of the prompt—by week three it runs in five minutes.
Here is a [type of document—industry report, board pack, vendor proposal]: [paste the document]. I am the owner of a [one line about your company]. Summarize it for a decision-maker: the five points I most need to know, anything that affects a company like mine specifically, and the two or three questions I should ask before acting on it. If the document does not answer something, say so instead of guessing.
That last sentence matters. Giving the tool permission to say “I don't know” is what makes its summaries trustworthy enough to act on.
A long-time customer emailed us, upset about [the issue]. Their email: [paste]. Draft a reply that acknowledges the frustration directly, explains our position in one honest sentence, and offers a call this week. Under 150 words. Warm and direct—no “we value your business,” no corporate speak.
You still read and adjust every word before sending. The tool removes the blank page and the tone-deaf first draft, not your judgment.
What should you ignore for now?
Knowing what to skip is worth as much as knowing what to start. Three categories of AI work get oversold to owners of non-technical companies, and all three can wait a year without costing you anything real. First, autonomous “agents”—systems that run multi-step work by themselves. The demos are impressive and the current reality is fragile: agents need careful setup, constant checking, and a technical person on call when something breaks. The tasks agents promise to automate are the same tasks the four workhorse workflows above already speed up, with you in control and no maintenance bill.
Second, custom builds—anything that requires an engineer, an API, or a vendor contract. There is a real version of that work, and when your company reaches it, the right move is an implementation partner, not a DIY weekend. That is also what people usually mean when they ask how to implement AI in their business in the deeper, systems sense—and it is a different sport from the one this guide teaches. You will know you are approaching that phase when your team has prompts and workflows that run daily and the bottleneck has shifted from skill to plumbing.
Third, the tool-of-the-week cycle. New AI tools launch constantly, and evaluating them is a full-time hobby that produces nothing. Pick one of the two established assistants—Claude or ChatGPT—and use it daily for a month on real work before you form an opinion about anything else. The skill you build transfers almost completely between tools; the habit is the asset, not the subscription.
Claude or ChatGPT—which one should you start with?
Both are capable general-purpose assistants, both have free plans that are genuinely enough to learn on, and the honest differences are smaller than the internet wants you to believe. Claude, made by Anthropic, is where I start most executives: it handles long documents unusually well, and its default writing style is plain and measured, which suits board papers and customer emails. ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, is the more widely known tool, with a larger ecosystem of extras built around it.
If a colleague or your kids swear by one, start there—the best first tool is the one someone nearby can help you with. What does not work is splitting attention across three or four tools and going shallow on all of them. Choose one, run this guide's five steps against it, and revisit the question in a month. Everything you learn—briefing with context, refining drafts, saving prompts—moves with you if you ever switch.
How do you know it's working?
You do not need a dashboard or a ROI model for the first ninety days. You need honest answers to a short list of questions, asked monthly.
- Hours back: are the workflows you adopted measurably faster? The weekly summary that took an hour now takes fifteen minutes—that kind of arithmetic is the real metric.
- Turnaround time: do customer replies, proposals, and internal summaries go out sooner than they did before you started? Speed your customers can feel is value.
- Reuse: do you have three or more saved prompts you run without thinking? Reuse is the sign a trick has become an asset.
- Quality holds: are you editing less over time, not more? Falling edit time means your prompts are improving.
- Spread: has at least one person on your team started their own workflow, without you pushing? Voluntary imitation is the strongest signal of all.
- Dread reduction: is one recurring task simply less dreadful than it was? Underrated, and usually the first thing owners mention.
When does teaching yourself stop being enough?
Everything in this guide, you can do alone, this week, for free—and many owners should do exactly that for a month or two. The ceiling I watch people hit usually arrives around month two or three: the personal workflows are running, the hours are coming back, and the question shifts. Which of your company's workflows—the quoting process, the sales follow-up, the way your firm writes to clients—should be rebuilt around these tools next, who should learn them first, and in what order? That is a prioritization question about your specific business, and generic guides cannot answer it.
That is the point where working with a human teacher—not an AI coach bot, not another video course—earns its keep. In coaching sessions we open your real workload and your team's real workload, find the hours these tools can genuinely hand back, and build the prompts, habits, and guardrails around your business, your voice, and your risk tolerance. This guide is the map. Coaching is walking it together on your terrain.
1-on-1 coaching
Want a teacher, not another tutorial?
Guides get you started. A 1-on-1 session gets you fluent—built on your actual work, at your pace.

Your coach
Coached by Pete Enestrom
Yale and Columbia grad, former Microsoft and Intel, and a venture-backed exited founder. Pete has spent the last four and a half years going deep on every major AI tool, and he teaches the way operators learn: on your real work, at your pace, with nothing assumed.

Common questions
Straight answers, the way I'd give them across a table.
Keep reading
For Your Role
AI for Executives: What Real Fluency Looks Like for Business Leaders
AI for executives means fluency, not a certificate: what fluency looks like for a CEO or president, and the five leadership conversations AI now touches.
ReadGuide
ChatGPT for Work: A Practical Guide for Non-Technical Executives
How non-technical executives use ChatGPT at work: drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, notes into action lists, and meeting prep—with six copy-paste prompts.
ReadGuide
How to Use Claude: A Practical Guide for Busy Executives
A plain-English guide to Claude for founders and executives: what it is, how to start in ten minutes, and five real workflows with copy-paste prompts.
ReadBeyond coaching
When the workflow needs to be encoded, not just learned — that's what our team at Zaigo builds.